From Enjoyment to Utility: Determinants of Digital Natives’ Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Penulis

  • Hasna Azzahidah Universitas Negeri Jakarta Penulis
  • Adnan Kasofi Universitas Negeri Jakarta Penulis
  • Osly Usman Universitas Negeri Jakarta Penulis
  • Ryna Parlyna Universitas Negeri Jakarta Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64243/JOSMI.02.1.07

Kata Kunci:

Digital natives, Generative artificial intelligence, UTAUT2, Technology adoption

Abstrak

GenAI's growing popularity has altered the way digital natives approach their work and schoolwork. Since most people choose not to utilize GenAI, it is crucial to determine what makes people want to perform certain things. This study uses the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) to investigate the elements that impact the intents of digital natives to use generative AI. Our quantitative cross-sectional research included 152 digital natives residing in Jakarta who had prior experience working with generative AI technologies. In order to analyze the collected data, Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used. The results show that effort and performance anticipation have a favorable effect on behavioral intention, which shows how important it is to have high hopes for performance improvements and simplicity of use to encourage adoption. Social influence has a statistically meaningful, although minor, effect on behavioral intention, in contrast to hedonic incentive, which does not. Overall, the model demonstrates moderate explanatory power, suggesting that generative AI adoption among digital natives is primarily driven by utilitarian considerations. These findings imply that generative artificial intelligence is mainly perceived as a functional, productivity-oriented tool rather than a source of enjoyment. The study offers practical implications for institutions and developers to prioritize usability and performance value when encouraging GenAI adoption in academic and professional context.

Referensi

Cabero-almenara, Julio, Antonio Palacios-rodríguez, María Isabel Loaiza-aguirre, Paola Salomé Andrade-abarca, and Antonio Palacios-rodríguez. 2024. “The Impact of Pedagogical Beliefs on the Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education : Predictive Model from UTAUT2.” (October):1–11. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1497705.

Creighton, Theodore B. 2018. “Digital Natives , Digital Immigrants , Digital Learners : An International Empirical Integrative Review of the Literature.” 19(1):132–40.

Feuerriegel, Stefan, and Christian Janiesch. 2024. “Generative AI.” 66(1):111–26. doi: 10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7.

Gazit, Tali, Tal Eitan, Lilach Gal, and Noah Gradovicth. 2025. “Adoption of Generative AI Technologies : Insights From the UTAUT2 Model , Personality Characteristics , and Behavioural Factors.” doi: 10.1002/jcal.70162.

Hair, Joseph F., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2022. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Kim, Youngsoo, Victor Blazquez, and Taeyeon Oh. 2024. “Determinants of Generative AI System Adoption and Usage Behavior in Korean Companies : Applying the UTAUT Model.”

Kparl, Emmanuel Mensah, and Faisal Iddris. 2024. “Factors Influencing the Adoption of ChatGPT for Innovation Generation : A Moderated Analysis of Innovation Capability and Gender Using UTAUT2 Framework . By.” 5645:135–48.

Lv, Zhihan. 2023. “Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Metaverse Era.” 3(May):208–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cogr.2023.06.001.

Papathomas, Aristides, George Konteos, and Giorgos Avlogiaris. 2025. “Behavioral Drivers of AI Adoption in Banking in a Semi-Mature Digital Economy : A TAM and UTAUT-2 Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives.”

Pasaribu, Popy Novita, and Diny Widiyaningrum. 2024. “UTAUT2 and Nonjudgmental Expectancy (NE) Model Insights into ChatGPT Adoption among College Students for Academic Use.” 2(1):235–50. doi: 10.32832/Article.

Rana, Masud, Mohammad Safaet, Nazmus Sakib, and Rafi Ahamed. 2024. “Assessing AI Adoption in Developing Country Academia : A Trust and Privacy-Augmented UTAUT Framework.” Heliyon 10(18):e37569. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569.

Venkatesh, Viswanath, Susan A. Brown, and Hilol Bala. 2012. “Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems.” 21–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02[.

Venkatesh, Viswanath, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” 27(3):425–78.

Xu, Si, Pengfei Chen, and Ge Zhang. 2024. “Exploring Chinese University Educators ’ Acceptance and Intention to Use AI Tools : An Application of the UTAUT2 Model.” (December):1–13. doi: 10.1177/21582440241290013.

Diterbitkan

2026-02-01