The Influence of Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Hedonic Motivation, and Price Value on Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Online Courses at Universitas Negeri Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64243/JOSMI.02.1.12Keywords:
Behavioral intention, E-learning, Hedonic motivation, Price value, UTAUT2, Online course adoptionAbstract
This research investigates the determinants of undergraduate students’ behavioural intention to adopt online courses at Universitas Negeri Jakarta (UNJ) through the UTAUT2 framework. Using PLS-SEM, data from 128 respondents were analysed to analyze all variables emerges as the most influential factor, followed by Hedonic Motivation, whereas the remaining constructs do not have a significant effect. The model accounts for 40.2% of the variance in behavioural intention. Overall, the results suggest that students’ engagement with online courses is shaped more by considerations of cost and enjoyment than by perceived usefulness or social pressure, offering valuable insights for the design and improvement of online learning platforms in the post-pandemic context.
References
Ain, N., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915597546
Alotumi, M. (2022). Factors influencing graduate students' behavioral intention to use Google Classroom: Case study mixed methods research. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3847-3868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10766-y
Benić, J. (2023). Online course as a part of online learning: A review of its learning-teaching methods, perspectives, and potentialities. [Unpublished thesis]. University of Zagreb. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:141:093075
Chang, A. (2012). UTAUT and UTAUT2: A review and agenda for future research. The WINNERS, 13(2), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v13i2.656
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dai, H. M., Teo, T., Rappa, N. A., & Huang, F. (2020). Explaining Chinese university students’ continuance learning intention in the MOOC setting: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective. Computers & Education, 150, 103850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103850
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
Kemdikbud. (2024). Laporan tren pembelajaran digital di perguruan tinggi Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id
Lv, N., & Li, Z. (2024). The effects of blended learning environment on college students’ learning effectiveness: Exploring the role of behavioral intentions and self-efficacy through the UTAUT2 model. SAGE Open, 14(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241233857
Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2019). Investigating the adoption of MOOCs: A technology–user–environment perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12314
McGraw, K. O., Molloy, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Technology native: Explaining differences in performance on digital versus conventional cognitive tests. Computers & Education, 58(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.007
Meet, R. K., Kala, D., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). Exploring factors affecting the adoption of MOOCs in Generation Z using extended UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4521-4545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10912-0
Musa, M., Ismail, M. N., Tahir, S., Md. Fudzee, M. F., & Jofri, M. H. (2022). Student acceptance towards online learning management system based on UTAUT2 model. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(11), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0131113
Putri, A. F., & Nugroho, A. (2023). E-learning adoption among Indonesian university students: Readiness, barriers, and perceived usefulness. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 17(1), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20623
Rudhumbu, N. (2022). Applying the UTAUT2 to predict the acceptance of blended learning by university students. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 17(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-08-2021-0084
Sari, N., Handayani, T., & Widodo, A. (2020). Implementasi e-learning pada mahasiswa UNM: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v7i2.32415
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Prakasam, N., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). The extended UTAUT2 model in technology adoption research: A meta-analytic structural equation modelling analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(6), 1427–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10058-3
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model and task–technology fit model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
Xu, W., Shen, Z.-Y., Lin, S.-J., & Chen, J.-C. (2022). Improving the behavioral intention of continuous online learning among learners in higher education during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 857709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857709
Zacharis, G., & Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Factors predicting university students’ behavioral intention to use eLearning platforms in the post-pandemic normal: A UTAUT2 approach with learning value. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12065–12082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10918-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tasha Dwi Oktora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
