Digital Literacy, Data Security Perception, and Behavioral Intention to Use Indonesia's Digital Identity Card (IKD): The Mediating Role of Perceived Ease of Use

Authors

  • Susetya Nugroho Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Osly Usman Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64243/JODIGBI.02.3.16

Keywords:

Behavioral Intention, Data Security Perception, Digital Identity (IKD), Digital Literacy, Perceived Ease of Use

Abstract

One of the important aspects of the digital transformation agenda of Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) in Indonesia is the Digital Identity Card (Identitas Kependudukan Digital/IKD). The distribution of its use is uneven because the urban areas are more digitally literate and the problem of personal data security remains although its use is slowly increasing in the urban areas. The research is based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and omission of the Perceived Usefulness as the mandatory and standardized usefulness of IKD, the study examines the effect of digital literacy and perception of data security on the behavioral intention of citizens to use IKD and how the perceived ease of use may mediate the relationship. A cross-sectional survey of 83 registered IKD users in DKI Jakarta, West Java and Banten was used as the data collection method and analyzed by PLS-SEM using SmartPLS 4. The common method bias was assessed by application of the single factor test and the marker-variable analysis and was found to be value of VIF which indicated no multicollinearity, SRMR = 0.071 was acceptably raised. A post-hoc power analysis provided further support of a sufficient statistical power (0.88). The results indicate that perception of data security is the most powerful predictor of the perceived ease of use (β = 0.550, p < 0.001, f² = 0.546) and behavioral intention (β = 0.351, p = 0.006). Moreover, the data security perception and behavioral intention are significantly (indirect = 0.177, p = 0.032), mediated by the perceived ease of use, but not by the digital literacy, which demonstrates a negative pattern of mediation, suggesting that the mediating process postulated by TAM is not equally effective between different antecedents. The implications of the findings on user experience design, data governance visibility, and the digital literacy policy in Indonesia and other developing economies which are undergoing digital transformation of the public services are enormous.

References

Abbas, A. (2024). Behavioral intention and technology adoption in digital public services: A systematic review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(2), 112–130.

AbdulKareem, A. K., & Oladimeji, K. A. (2024). Cultivating the digital citizen: Trust, digital literacy and e-government adoption. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(2), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2023-0196

Abdulkareem, A. K., & Ramli, R. M. (2021). The effect of digital literacy on e-government service adoption in public administration. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(4), 88–97.

Acquah, E. O. (2024). Digital capabilities and citizens' engagement with e-government services. Telematics and Informatics, 89, 102128.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Direktorat Jenderal Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil [Ditjen Dukcapil]. (2023). Laporan Kinerja Ditjen Dukcapil Tahun 2023. Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia.

Duan, Y., & Dong, X. (2025). Does digital literacy matter for e-government usage behavior? An empirical analysis based on data from rural women in China. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251376118

Gesmundo, K. R., & Medallon, M. C. (2025). Perceived ease of use and behavioral intention in the adoption of digital government services. Journal of Digital Government, 3(1), 45–62.

Gui, X., Zhang, H., Wang, J., & Li, M. (2024). Technology security, perceived safety, and continuance intention in digital government services. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, 108214.

Gupta, A., Singh, R., & Mehra, P. (2025). Trust, risk, privacy, and security in e-government adoption: A meta-analytic review. Government Information Quarterly, 42(2), 102010.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Handajani, L., Supriyadi, D., & Widyana, R. (2025). Digital literacy, trust, and e-government service quality: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Public Administration, 10(1), 1–18.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

Julius, K., Ndhlovu, T., & Mwanza, P. (2025). Privacy security and user trust in digital government services. Information Technology & People, 38(3), 770–792.

Kaur, P., & Sharma, S. (2022). The role of perceived security in influencing behavioral intention toward digital financial services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 27(4), 281–295.

Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 72 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar dan Spesifikasi Perangkat Keras, Perangkat Lunak, dan Blangko Kartu Tanda Penduduk Elektronik serta Penyelenggaraan Identitas Kependudukan Digital. Kemendagri.

Kim, S., Lee, K. H., & Jhang, J. (2025). Digital literacy and participation in public digital services: Cross-national evidence. Telecommunications Policy, 49(2), 102723.

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.

Lee-Geiller, S. (2024). The moderating effect of digital literacy on the link between e-government effectiveness and trust in government. Journal of Policy Studies, 39(4), 77–92.

Or, C. K. L. (2024). Perceived ease of use, attitudes, and user intentions in healthcare digital applications. Health Informatics Journal, 30(1), 14604582241231790.

Persadha, R., Rahayu, M., & Nurbaya, S. (2024). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intention in Indonesian digital public services. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 10(2), 143–158.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com

Sheppard, M., & Vibert, C. (2019). Revisiting the relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Heliyon, 5(9), e02534.

Taherdoost, H. (2017). Determining sample size; how to calculate survey sample size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2, 237–239.

Tırpan, G., & Bakırtaş, İ. (2024). Perceived ease of use and technology acceptance: A structural approach to digital government adoption. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 65, 101398.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

Yulianto, A., Wahyudi, M., & Setiawan, R. (2025). Behavioral intention in digital government adoption: A systematic review of antecedents and mediating factors. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 14(1), 122–135.

Zhang, J., Luximon, Y., & Song, Y. (2019). The role of perceived security, perceived credibility and psychological characteristics in the use of mobile payment services. Sustainability, 11(11), 3071.

Zubir, M. H. H., & Abdul Latip, M. S. (2024). Factors affecting citizens’ intention to use e-government services: Assessing the mediating effect of perceived usefulness and ease of use. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(3), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-04-2023-0040

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026