Beyond Achievement: Reimagining Psychological Safety as a Foundation for Meaningful Learning in Indonesian Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64243/JOCESI.01.1.04Kata Kunci:
Educational Psychology, Intellectual Risk-Taking, Meaningful Learning, Psychological Safety, Student Engagement, Student VoiceAbstrak
Contemporary education increasingly asks students to think critically, collaborate, and participate actively in constructing knowledge, yet active-learning designs often assume that participation will follow automatically once instructional strategies are well designed. This assumption leaves an important psychological condition underexamined: whether students perceive the learning environment as safe enough to speak, question, disagree, and err without fear of humiliation or negative evaluation. This article develops a conceptual argument that meaningful learning depends not only on pedagogical design but also on the psychological conditions that allow students to engage intellectually and socially in the learning process. Using a structured narrative literature review, the article synthesizes scholarship on psychological safety, student voice, intellectual risk-taking, student engagement, and meaningful learning that has largely developed along parallel rather than integrated theoretical lines. From this synthesis, the article proposes the Psychological Safety Centered Learning (PSCL) Model, a five-stage conceptual framework describing a hypothesized pathway from psychological permission to student voice, intellectual risk-taking, reflective engagement, and meaningful learning. The article discusses the model's theoretical and practical contributions, along with anticipated challenges related to cultural variation, measurement, and teacher capacity. As a conceptual proposal built from literature synthesis rather than original data collection, the PSCL Model requires further empirical validation, instrument development, and testing across diverse educational contexts before its practical claims can be considered established.
Referensi
Ananta, S. (2026). The role of psychological safety and belonging in classroom engagement among first-year undergraduates. Jurnal Informasi dan Komunikasi Administrasi Perkantoran, 10(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.20961/jikap.v10i1.108676
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Baranova, T., Kobicheva, A., Tokareva, E., & Federov, D. (2022). The relationship between students’ psychological security level, academic engagement and performance variables in the digital educational environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9385–9399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11024-5
Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20270
Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431693013001002
Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools: From programs to strategies. Social Policy Report, 26(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2012.tb00073.x
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00354.x
Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Tu, X. (2021). The role of classroom culture and psychological safety in EFL students’ engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 760903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760903
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Aoliya Wijayanti Kusuma Asri Arifin

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





