Regulatory Loopholes, Moral Hazard, and Financial Integrity: Analyzing Article 50A of Indonesia’s Financial Sector Law in the Danantara Patriot Bond Financing

Authors

  • Arif Dilianto Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Eric Hermawan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Mandala Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64243/JODIGBI.02.5.01

Keywords:

Financial Innovation, Financial Integrity, Moral Hazard, Patriot Bond, Regulatory Arbitrage

Abstract

Differences in legal protection in strategic financing innovations can affect market behavior and pose problems for financial integrity. This study examines Article 50A of Law Number 4 of 2026 regarding Danantara special debt instruments, especially Patriot Bonds, through a qualitative normative policy analysis with legislative, conceptual, comparative, and regulatory policy approaches. By examining legal provisions, institutional documents, constitutional trial processes, financial sector regulations, FATF assessments, and related literature, this study finds that the combination of transaction validity, different investor protections, and restrictions on the use of transaction information can affect transaction traceability, legal deterrence, and the effectiveness of financial intelligence and law enforcement. These findings do not indicate that Patriot Bonds are illegal or money laundering-related, but indicate potential vulnerabilities if legal protection is interpreted too broadly. This research proposes conditional, goal-based, and traceable investor protection as part of accountable strategic financing governance.

References

ANTARA News. (2026). Danantara terbitkan surat utang senilai Rp7 triliun. ANTARA News, 17 March 2026. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/5480894/danantara-terbitkan-surat-utang-senilai-rp7-triliun

Barbary, V., Dixon, A. D., & Schena, P. J. (2023). The evolving landscape of sovereign wealth funds in a changing world economy: How resilient are the Santiago Principles? In J. Hillebrand Pohl, J. Warchol, T. Papadopoulos, & J. Wiesenthal (Eds.), Weaponising investments (pp. 17–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/17280_2023_1

Chiu, I. H. Y. (2023). An institutional account of responsiveness in financial regulation—Examining the fallacy and limits of “same activity, same risks, same rules” as the answer to financial innovation and regulatory arbitrage. Computer Law & Security Review, 51, 105868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105868

Financial Action Task Force. (2023). Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures—Indonesia: Mutual evaluation report. FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/MER-Indonesia-2023.html

Financial Action Task Force. (2026). Indonesia’s progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing. FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/indonesia-fur-2026.html

Gaviyau, W., & Sibindi, A. B. (2023). Anti-money laundering and customer due diligence: Empirical evidence from South Africa. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(5), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-06-2023-0103

Hinrichsen, S., Reichert-Facilides, D., Waibel, M., & Wiedenbrüg, A. (2026). Designing sovereign debt legislation: Learning from comparative experience. Journal of Financial Regulation, 12(1), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaf012

International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds. (2008). Sovereign wealth funds: Generally accepted principles and practices—“Santiago Principles”. International Monetary Fund.

Karakoyun, O. K., Karakaplan, M. U., & Neyaptı, B. (2024). Endogenous bank regulation and supervision: Long term implications. Journal of Financial Stability, 70, 101216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101216

Karlsdóttir, E. R., Awad, R., Emre, E., Gullo, A., Jociėnė, A., & Verkoren, C. (2024). Resolving opaque bank ownership and related-party exposures. IMF Technical Notes and Manuals, 2024(2). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400258404.005

Kustodian Sentral Efek Indonesia. (2025). Registration of long-term debt securities issued by PT Danantara Investment Management. KSEI.

Kustodian Sentral Efek Indonesia. (2026). Registration of long-term debt securities II issued by PT Danantara Investment Management. KSEI.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2026). Pemohon perbaiki alasan uji imunitas bagi pembeli instrumen surat utang khusus. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Manov, A. (2021). Shooing the vultures? The case for investment treaty protection of sovereign debt. Arbitration International, 37(1), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiaa048

Marjosola, H. (2021). The problem of regulatory arbitrage: A transaction cost economics perspective. Regulation & Governance, 15(2), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12287

Minto, A., Prinz, S., & Wulff, M. (2021). A risk characterization of regulatory arbitrage in financial markets. European Business Organization Law Review, 22, 719–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00219-x

Pernell, K., & Jung, J. (2024). Rethinking moral hazard: Government protection and bank risk-taking. Socio-Economic Review, 22(2), 625–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwad050

Republic of Indonesia. (2010). Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the prevention and eradication of money laundering. Government of the Republic of Indonesia.

Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Ministry of Finance Regulation Number 196/PMK.03/2021 concerning procedures for implementing the voluntary disclosure program for taxpayers. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.

Republic of Indonesia. (2026). Law Number 4 of 2026 concerning amendments to Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning financial sector development and strengthening. Government of the Republic of Indonesia.

Setyastomo, D., Mardikaningsih, R., & Sulani. (2024). Legal implications of beneficial ownership disclosure in closed companies on strengthening the anti-money laundering system in Indonesia. Journal of Social Science Studies, 4(1), 67–74.

Sultan, N., & Mohamed, N. (2023). Challenges for financial institutes in implementing robust customer due diligence in Pakistan. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(5), 926–946. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-06-2022-0095

Downloads

Published

01-09-2026